Varroa Destructor

[stefan1]

Am gasit unele date pe care nu le stiam despre acest paduche (de fapt capusha) care afecteaza atat de mult apicultura.
Specia Varroa Destructor are 6 varietati, care afecteaza si apis cerana din toata Asia. Aceste albine insa pot mentine un echilibru al infestarii intre 0 si 700 de paduchi pe colonie. Pot detecta paduchii si in celule capacite si daca infestarea este prea mare descapaceste larva si intrerupe ciclul parazitului. Fata de Varroa Jacobsoni, femela de A.D. este mai mare (are latimea de 1500 microni) si are profilul mai elipsoidal fata de V, Jacobsoni, care este mai rotunda. Masculul este mult mai mic (doar 400 microni) si e aproape sferic, deci neadaptat sa paraziteze albina adulta.
V.D. are 8 picioare in stadiul de adult, dar numai 6 in cel de larva.
  Ciclul de viata
Femela intra in celulele larvelor cam cu 15 ore inainte de capacire. Alte surse vorbeau de 36 de ore. Se aseaza spre fundul celulei sa nu poata fi scoasa de albinele care grijesc larva. Se pare ca paduchii sunt atrasi spre larve de catre esterii de acizi grasi (feromoni), palmitat de metil, emisi de larva, care provoaca capacirea, dar atrag si paduchele. Prefera celulele de trantor unde o femela poate creste pana la 5-7 pui, fata de 3-6 pe o larva de albina.
Primul ou depus este de femela, apoi al doilea de mascul (nefecundat). Urmeaza alte oua din care ies numai femele, depuse cam la 30 de ore interval. Daca in celula este doar un paduche, imperecherea este sigur consnguina, intre puiul mascul si surorile lui. Intai se imperecheaza cu femela iesita din primul ou. Pot fi pana la 9 acuplari. Cand a doua fiica devine matura, masculul o abandoneaza pe prima si se imperecheaza cu a doua, apoi repeta cu urmatoarele surori. Contrar la ce se stia pana de curand, o femela se poate imperechea doar in celula unde s-a nascut. Apoi o parte din tractul genital este distrus si orice imperechere este exclusa. Daca masculul moare mai repede, toate femelele raman infertile pentru totdeauna. Acest lucru apare la 10-46% dintre femele.
Durata de dezvoltare la mascu este 5,5-7 zile
Durata de dezvoltare la femele este 7,5-9 zile (dupa Fantidis)
Femela se hraneste cu hemolimfa larvei si pupei si se admite ca dupa depunerea oualor, moare.
Parazitul poate trai 2-3 luni pe vara si 4-6 luni pe iarna.
Larvele parazitate dau albine care pot fi pana cu pana la 1/3 mai usoare decat un pui normal si pot avea deformari la aripi si corp. Daca o larva este parazitata de mai mult de 8 paraziti, poate muri inainte de eclozionare
Testul de infestare cu foaie impregnata cu grasime: daca dupa 24 de ore se gaseste pe foaie mai mult de 10 paraziti, infestarea se considera ridicata. Se recomanda ca daca infestarea este mai are de 3%, sa se faca tratament.

[D006]

6 metode de tratament.
Sixth in a series on Integrated Pest Management of varroa
Introduction
None of the biotechnical methods that I detailed last month will control varroa alone.  Now it's time to give you some real meat!  Either of the two methods I'm about to describe, used alone, have been tested and proven to keep varroa at tolerable levels if performed properly.  Used together, they may be a nonchemical one-two punch that will give us the upper hand on the mite.
A note to those commercial beekeepers who are saying, "Jeez, this guy is totally whacked out!  I'm already maxed out for time, and can't be putting special labor-intensive gizmos into my hives—that's for hobbyists.  Plus, I can't take a chance on trusting my mortgage on some untested mite control method."  In answer, my California son would say, "I feel you, man."  I've got two groups of beekeeping friends—hobbyists who are willing to test new things on their handful of colonies, and commercial guys who run very efficient operations by rotating a series of ag chems.  What I've been seeing the past few years, are hobbyist/sideliners maintaining strong colonies without any synthetic miticides.  I was skeptical as hell at first, but they've demonstrated the feasibility.  As with any historical change in an industry, the majority says, "It can't be done, we can't afford it, it won't work in reality."  Then, several years later, they look back and see that it was done, the industry could afford it, and it did work in reality."

[D006]

Rame
Pozele nu se incarca

[D006]

Poate merge asa.

[D006]

da, dar fara poze.
Powdered sugar dusting
The second punch in our combination came from Finland.  A few years ago, I came across an article in ABJ by the Finnish researcher, Dr. Kamran Fakhimzadeh (2000).  He had been looking at various materials for dusting bees, with the intent to cause increased drop of the phoretic varroa mites.  He hit upon powdered sugar as being both non contaminating to honey, and just the right size to clog up the mites' feet.  Pettis and Shimanuki (1999) had already proposed using dust in conjunction with a screened bottom board for varroa control. I mentioned the articles at our local bee meeting.  One hobbyist member, Janet Brisson, was taken by the possibility of using sugar dusting and screened bottoms for mite control, and became a proselytizer for the method.  I found the concept to be of interest, but the time-consuming method by which she and others went about applying the dust seemed totally unpractical to me.
Last year, at the club meeting, I asked for a show of hands as to what methods members were employing to control the mite.  I was surprised that the majority were using sugar dusting!  Finally, after seeing the method apparently being successful for two years, and reading Jerry Hayes (2004) promote the "Dowda" method in The Classroom, I felt that I needed to give sugar dusting a second look!
I did a few tests.  I saw that sugar dusting sure did cause a lot of mites to drop, but it didn't appear to affect subsequent stickyboard counts much, even after two weeks of repeated dustings!  Something didn't make sense.  How could this method work if it didn't affect sticky counts?
Then I started researching mite population dynamics, and realized the error of my thinking.  Mites are only phoretic for about 5 days during broodrearing (a range of 4-15 days, dependent upon a number of factors (Harbo and Harris (2004)).  Therefore, one would expect about a 20% turnover of phoretic mites every day, as older ones reenter brood cells, and new ones emerge.  Knowing this, even if you had some new wonder chemical that killed 100% of the phoretic mites one day, you'd still have a 20% return of the phoretic mite population the next day, 40% by the second day, and back to the pretreatment level within a week!  If you were to take a stickyboard count a week after the 100% kill, you would see zero effect from the dusting!
What I realized was that the problem wasn't that sugar dusting didn't work, but that I was not measuring its efficacy the right way!  So I looked to the literature for measured levels of efficacy of an in-hive sugar dusting.  To my surprise, there weren't any.  Fakhimzadeh had only measured the increase in daily mite drop and Aliano and Ellis (2005) had recorded a 75% mite drop only from caged bees.  I contacted every researcher and beekeeper I could for an in-hive efficacy figure, but no one had one.  So I collected the hard data myself, by dusting three test colonies (one, two, and three story), measuring the mite drop for the first hour, and then sacrificing all the bees in the colonies and washing the mites from them.  I will write up a full version of the results when we complete testing, but in short, about a third of all phoretic mites in a colony drop in the first hour after dusting! 
I now had a figure that I could use for crude modeling of the effect of repeated sugar dusting on mite population growth.  I wanted to see if a mathematical model based upon the mite kill rate I measured would reflect the reports from the field.  Since Fakhimzadeh and other beekeepers report that mites continue to fall at an increased rate for over 24 hours, I made the assumption that a good sugar dusting would kill 50% of the phoretic mites—a round number based upon a 33% initial kill, plus an arbitrarily assumed half again residual kill.  These are working numbers subject to revision when we obtain more data.
Let me be clear at this point.  I'm not about to recommend any varroa control treatment based upon mathematical modeling.  What I'm curious to see, is whether the amount of mite drop caused by powdered sugar dusting could be mathematically expected to effect the mite control claimed by its proponents.  So I called around to those who have been using the technique for over two years, and asked them for their records and observations.   Some dusting practitioners had used ancillary treatments, such as drone brood trapping, or essential oils, so I allowed for those treatments.  Their records indicated that:  Initial dusting once a week for several weeks knocks mite levels way back, dusting twice a month keeps the mites at low levels, and dusting monthly (or even less frequently) keeps the mites at tolerable levels. 
So, let's see if crude mathematical modeling supports the field experience.  I set up a simple mite population growth curve based upon a starting population of 100 mites, and a reasonable 2.4% daily mite growth rate (Martin 1998).  Then I killed 1/6 of the total mite population at each dusting, based upon killing half of the one-third of the total mite population that is phoretic at any given time during the treatment period of March 1 through September 1.  This model is very crude, and doesn't account for amount of drone brood, multiple infestation, or other variables, and should only be used to give us a rough idea of the feasibility of the technique.  I must admit, the results surprised me in how closely they reflected field experience! Clearly, powdered sugar dusting as a mite control measure has proven field efficacy, plus a mathematical model to support it.
 
The estimated effect of powdered sugar dusting over a screened bottom on mite population growth, based upon a starting population of 100 mites, a daily growth rate of 2.4%, and an estimated kill of 50% of the phoretic mites per dusting treatment.   Note that weekly dustings would result in a decrease in the mite population.  These curves are based upon very crude math, and are only for general illustrative purposes, although they confirm field experience.
Note that the control curve reaches a devastating mite level by September 1st.  Monthly dusting in this model keeps the mite population below a moderate threshold of 3000 mites, and bimonthly dusting keeps 'em below 1000—a load that is considered acceptable by most all authorities.  The weekly dustings actually decreased the mite population over the treatment period.
Not only that, but the illustrated curves likely underestimate the effect of sugar dusting, since even though it effectively kills only a sixth of the mites, the mites killed are those that would have been most likely to survive to reproduce.  That is, once a mite is in the phoretic stage, its natural mortality rate is very low—about 0.6% (6 out of 1000) per day, as compared to the 20 –30% mortality of those first emerging from cells (Martin 1998).  Although about two-thirds of the mites are under cappings and thereby protected from dusting treatments, that proportion is tempered by the fact that a quarter of them will not survive through emergence.  This makes the mortality of the phoretic mites more important than their proportion might indicate.  Recall from my discussion of mite population dynamics that that a female mite needs to average 2-3 reproductive cycles for varroa populations to grow at the pace that we see in the field.  If sugar dusting knocks a mite down early in her life, she will be unable to complete multiple cycles. The surprising effectiveness of sugar dusting may due to its impact on the average number of reproductive cycles that a mite can complete.
The Oliver 15-second sugar dust method
Before I even considered advocating sugar dusting, I knew that no one with more than a hive or two would be out there using the suggested application methods of flour sifters or squeeze bottle puffing.  It was far too time consuming!  So I bought 50 lbs of powdered sugar from my local baker (it's cheaper that way) and set out to see if I could come up with an easier, quicker method.  I did.
The method:
Materials:
1.       A 5 gal bucket with a screw top lid to hold the fine confectioner's sugar.  Hobbyists can use any airtight kitchen container.  Large operators may wish to use a rectangular plastic waste basket on a caddy that also holds the screen.
2.       A bee brush with a 1-cup measuring cup taped to the handle (large operators will need a cup with a strong handle).  Fluffing the sugar once by tipping the bucket will make it much easier to scoop.
3.       A wood-rimmed moving screen of (strong) steel window screen.  The rim should be ¾" on the top side (to contain the sugar), and at least 3/8" on the other (to space the screen above the top bars).  I used 1/8" hardware cloth at first—it's faster to sift, but doesn't do as good a job at breaking up the lumps of sugar.
4.       The colony should be on a screened bottom (I'm assuming this, but have not tested to see if it's truly necessary). 
Technique:
1.       Smoke the colony.
2.       Remove the cover and smoke the bees down off the top bars.
3.       Put the moving screen over the frames, and then use the cup to spread powdered sugar on the screen over the cluster area.  Use 1 cup (approx. 100g) for 1-story colonies, or 2 cups for double deeps.
4.       Flip the brush around, and use it to sift the sugar through the screen.
5.       Lift the screen, and continue to use the brush crosswise across the top bars to sift the sugar into the beeways.
6.       Replace the cover.  We do this entire operation handily in less than 15 seconds!
7.       Mites will begin to fall within seconds.  If you've put a dry stickyboard under the screened floor, you can get a good indication of your mite level in an hour.
 
Tools for the Oliver 15-second sugar dust.  Note the cup duct taped to the brush handle as a time-saving measure.  Window screen in wooden frame.

Use one cup of sugar for singles, two cups for doubles.

Brush the sugar through the screen over the cluster of bees.

Lift the screen, and brush the sugar crossways across the frames so that it all falls on the bees.  The whole process takes less than 15 seconds!

Kill two birds with one stone by combining dusting with other hive procedures.  Feeding pollen supplement here.

This is a frame from the bottom brood chamber of a double, two minutes after dusting the top bars of the upper box with two cups of sugar.  Note the sugar that has fallen through onto the top bars, and onto the bees and combs.

Close up of the bees from the frame in the previous photo.  Note the sugar dust on their bodies, even though we dusted the box above.
Tips:
1.       In this case, more is better.  Use enough sugar so that some falls through the screened floor.
2.       Test your technique by pulling frames of bees from the bottom box in about two minutes.  They should be obviously dusted white.
3.       Keep yer powder dry!  Damp powdered sugar clumps too much to dust the bees efficiently.  Store it in a warm, dry place.
Discussion
OK, sugar dusting has a proven track record, a mathematical explanation for its efficacy based upon mite population dynamics, and can be done quickly and cheaply (less than 25¢ to treat a 2-story colony).  Why does it work, and will it harm my bees?  Luckily, this question has largely been answered, both from practical experience, and scientific research.  Sugar dust adheres to a mite's ambulacra (foot pads) (Fakhimzadeh 2000), apparently causing the mite to lose its grip on the bee.  Dusting may, in addition, stimulate bee grooming behavior (Macedo & Ellis 2002).  It is a mechanical method of mite control, rather than chemical.  It does not directly kill the mites—they fall out of the hive and can't return.  Fakhimzadeh (2001) found that direct heavy dusting resulted in greater mite drop than light blow dusting, and that no sugar particles were found in the bees' trachea (breathing tubes).  Heavy dusting may cause significant egg removal, and loss of a fraction of the older larvae (Aliano & Ellis 2005).  This loss would be of little consequence, since a portion a day's quota of eggs represents a relatively minor investment to the colony.  Fakhimzadeh (2001) also found that dusting at frequent intervals did not appear to affect brood production, colony strength, queen survivorship, or honey production.  Note that he dusted with less sugar 15g (about 1/8 cup per colony) than is currently recommended.  His control of mite buildup was also less.  I have not heard reports of problems due to dusting with 2 cups per colony.
There are drawbacks to sugar dusting.  First, its application is dependent upon fair weather.  It may also draw ants.  Janet Brisson reported that sugar dusting during a nectar dearth may initiate robbing.  I suggested that she try the old trick of removing all the hive covers in the apiary when you begin.  That stopped the robbing problem.  The question has arisen as to the best time of day to dust.  I don't know.  Most mites hang out mostly on younger bees around the brood nest, so it may not be important to dust all the foragers.  We still have lots to learn!
Some practitioners suggest banging the side of the hive after application to dislodge the sugar and stir up the bees.  This makes sense.  I've had an additional brainstorm:  I've figured out how to effectively infuse powdered sugar with menthol, in the hope that it will agitate the mites, and cause more to drop.  But first I need to test it to see if it kills brood.  I'll keep you posted on the results.
The beauty of sugar dusting is that you can do it as often as needed to control the mite.  If your bees pick up extra mites from collapsing colonies, hit 'em with sugar.  Use the "Shoot first and ask questions later" method of dusting and taking a mite sample at the same time with a stickyboard (it doesn't need to be sticky if you use enough sugar so that it falls on the board).  If you see a lot of mites, dust weekly; if there are few mites, wait a month.  When your colonies are broodless, a few sugar dustings would be expected to knock the snot out of the mite population, since they are all exposed to sugar at that time.  I'll try to get some numbers next winter.
I have been corresponding with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation.  I explained how sugar dusting (and grease patties for tracheal mite control) were used, and asked them for an opinion as to whether they would be considered as pesticides, and therefore subject to regulation.  Their response was:
"Randy, the two products of discussion are food products that are
normally consumed and have labels that do not make any pest control
claims. The way you are using them is to either create a barrier to the
mites or mask the smell of the bees so the mites won't be attracted to
them.  These actions are usually not thought to be methods of pest
control that need to be registered. These are like home-remedies.  As
long as the food product labels do not make any pest control claims
like kills, controls, repels, etc. mites in bees, these are not
pesticide uses and do not have to be registered."
Bottom Line
Surprise—powdered sugar dusting really kills drops a significant proportion of the phoretic mites, and that exerts a strong effect on mite reproduction.  It's safe, doesn't hurt the colony, can be used even when they're storing honey, works any time of year that the bees are not in tight cluster, is cheap, and only takes 15 seconds!  If you use an insert, it will even tell you how soon you should dust again.

[D006]

The one-two punch—30 seconds to knock out varroa!
Drone brood trapping and sugar dusting—what a combination!  The first punch gets mites in the brood; the second knocks them off the bees.  Do them both at the same time every four weeks during spring, and sugar dusting alone at other times as needed.  It'll take you 30 seconds at colony, and cost you less than a quarter.  Doesn't get much better than that!
Either or both of these methods can be used during a honeyflow!  I have not yet tried dusting down through the honey supers, but I imagine that the technique would be more effective if you lifted the supers and dusted the top of the brood chamber.  Better yet, get the mite level down before supering, so you can wait until you pull the honey (but don't wait too long).
Now let me be clear.  I have limited experience with sugar dusting myself.  I've dusted about 100 lbs of sugar so far, and have the technique down, but have not yet used it in my operation to any extent.   We dusted 80 colonies in an almond orchard this spring, but there was not enough mite drop to make it worthwhile to dust the rest at that time.  But I'll sure be dusting later this season!  I'll let you know how it goes.
My new website
I've had requests from all over the world for reprints of my articles.  I thought of combining them into a booklet, but realized that it would be out of date as soon as it was printed.  So I decided to start a website for the express purpose of summarizing the state of knowledge on varroa management, general beekeeping, and California almond pollination, based upon practical application of scientific research, commercial experience, and tested methods from all countries.  My goals are to keep it a concise source of information for the busy beekeeper, and to update it with feedback from readers, researchers, and field evaluation.  It should be up by the time you read this!  Log on to randyoliver.com.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Janet Brisson, Zion Guinn, Joe Carson, Jerry Hayes, Marion Ellis, and the students from Nevada County Science Center, who counted mites and bees.  I especially appreciate the generous donation from the 2007 Honeybee, Beekeeping, and Environment Symposium sponsored by Summerfield Waldorf School and Beekind, Sebastopol, Calif. in support of my ongoing research.
Coming next month:  Chemical weaponry—the IPM fallback position
Feedback
Tips: Put a 3/4" rim on both sides of the screen frame.  By having more clearance above the top bars, dusting goes faster.  Always check to make sure some excess sugar falls through the screened bottom--this tells you that you have used enough sugar.  Avoid dusting on windy days!
Q:  Can I use ordinary powdered sugar from the store, even though it contains starch?
A:  I have not heard of any negative effects upon the bees due to the small amount of starch, even from beekeepers who have been dusting for years. This question has been debated ad nauseum on the Web.  Starch naturally occurs in some pollens, and bees seem to be able to process it.  You're only talking about some 200 micrograms of starch per bee per dusting.  I will be performing experiments on confined bees to see if the small amount of starch is a problem.  As of this time, go ahead and use normal powdered sugar from the grocery.  If you purchase it from a bakery in bulk, ask for the finest grind.
Q:  How often should I trap and dust?
A:  Start in spring as soon as the bees begin foraging.  You want to minimize colony disruption.  Every time you pull the drone trap frame, you stand a chance of injuring the queen.  Try trapping and then dusting on the same visit every four weeks (28 days).  Take a one-hour mite count (see below) to see if you can wait another month.  I'm working on finding if a 10-minute mite count will work.
Q:  What is the "threshold" number of mites after a dusting, that would indicate that dusting should be repeated in a week?
A:  I do not have a number at this time, but will soon be running experiments to find out.  Let's do a little theoretical math:  Let's say that you don't want the mite level to get above a 2% infestation.  Therefore, you'd be concerned if the level approached 1%, since it could double in a month. Please refer to my Strategy article.  You can accept a higher infestation late in the season than you would accept early.  In spring, you might want to keep the level below 1/2%.
If a colony has a 1% infestation of the adult bees, and there are 30,000 bees (moderately strong), then there would be 300 phoretic mites.  If dusting knocked off one third of those in the first hour, you would get a count of 100 mites.  Therefore, until I get further data, I'd dust in two weeks if you got a 1-hour post-dusting mite drop of 100 mites from a moderately strong colony. Early in the season, try to keep the count below 50 mites dropping in the first hour.
Q: I am a new beekeeper this year so please keep this in mind.  The question that I have is:  what makes the bees decide to fill the bottom of your frame design with only drone comb rather than establishing worker comb?  I love the simplicity of your design and plan to incorporate it into my hives.
A:  This is normal bee behavior during a spring nectar flow for any space at the periphery of the broodnest.  It is also normal to store honey at the top.
Q:  Should I use the drone trap frame in a starting colony that is still in the first brood box?
A:  Updated 7/25/07 Trap frames appear to work best in the upper brood chamber, generally position 3 or 4, in the springtime.
Q:  Do I need to break down the brood chamber to dust?
A:  Based upon the photos in the article, I'd guess no, but have not confirmed this experimentally.
Q:  Can I dust with honey supers on?
A:  The method does not contaminate your honey, so the answer is yes.  However, the supers may need to be lifted, in  order to effectively dust the top of the brood chamber.  I've had some success in dusting 3-deep colonies by using 4 cups of sugar, but the bees in the bottom brood chamber do not get covered as evenly as when you dust a double deep with 2 cups.
Q: I was wondering if you have a plan for your  drone trapping frame you would be willing to share.
A:  Yes.  Cut the ends off a grooved top bar.  Saw a strip of plastic worker foundation to 2-1/2", turn the top bar upside down between the end bars to pinch the foundation in place, and nail in place.  The amount of  exposed foundation  should be 1-7/8" or less (or some colonies will raise a line of worker brood at the bottom).  Some plastic foundations have raised cells, and the cut edge won't fit into the existing frame grooves (Permadent works well).  If necessary, you may have to use a table saw to cut the grooves wider before you assemble the frames.
Q:   What do you think of adding a drone frame 2 weeks apart, one in the top hive body and one in the bottom hive body? Would this set them too far back in worker brood or could it possibly maximize mite harvests?  One frame in each box may also target mites in each box?...
A:  I'd just do the top box with my design.  Less colony disruption, With my frame design, bees would put worker brood in th top section of the frame if the frame were placed in lower box.  It might expose more mites to the frame, but might not be worth it due to additional colony disruption, chance of killing queen, and time to split the boxes.
Q:  I think 4 weeks is a little too long to keep drone brood in.  I work in a 2 to 3 week rotation, but with the rain and traveling, it was almost 4 weeks before I was able to get into the hives and the drones had started to hatch out. 
A:  The ideal timing would be as soon as all the drone brood is capped.  That could theoretically happen as early as day 13, if the bees built comb in two days, then the queen layed eggs in every cell in one day.  However, that is unlikely to happen.  Remember, each individual drone cell only traps mites on days 8 and 9—none before, none after.  So removal at 2 weeks might render the mite trapping largely ineffective. 
Giving an allowance of three days for the bees to build comb before the queen starts laying, the trap frame would begin trapping mites on day 11.  Removing the comb at week 3 would allow 10 days of trapping, but you'd still have a safety margin of 6 days left before the first drones could emerge (and release mites) on day 27. 
Waiting until day 28 (4 weeks) you might have a few drones hatching, but you would have far more mites still trapped in the frame.  So my recommendation would be: if you have the time to check the frames at 3 weeks, and most of  the drone brood is capped, replace it.  This timing would give the greatest efficacy, but only if there is little open drone brood remaining on the comb.  Otherwise, just wait for 4 weeks, for a no-brainer timing.
Even simpler--cut out drone brood any time after it's capped, but not before.  Be sure to cut it out before it emerges!
Q:  Can I use an empty frame in the nest as a drone trap, or is having some comb overhead for honey important?
A:  Sure, the only reason for split frame is to make it easier to save the bees' honey while cutting out the drone comb.

Q:   Or can an I use a frame with drone size wax foundation without the wires for each month's treatment?
A:  Sure.

[Bătrânul]

Eu sint plecat de mai mult timp din TARA si am uitat limba romina si uite asa vam tradus dupa stiinta ...     Am inteles ca in lupta contra varoa nu avem nevoie decit de un PIEPTENE

[stefan1]

Ar fi bine daca cineva care stie bine engleza sa ne traduca. Am inteles, totusi din asta cateva lucruri.
La stupii salbatici cam 17% din celule sunt de trantori.
Paduchii sunt mult mai atrasi de fagurii vechi, chiar de 4-5 ori mai mult decat de fagurii noi. Deci ar fi mai bine reutilizat fagurul din care am scos puietul de trantori.
Ar trebui conceputa o metoda de a avea permanent puiet de trantori la capacire, tinand cont ca doar doua zile inainte de capacire, larvele atrag paduchii.

[D006]

Hmmm, e cam mult de tradus dar poate intreaba cineva sau fac un rezumat.
Dar, dupa sfatul lui Stefan1 la un stup de acasa am gasit varroa si poze i-am facut.

[D006]

Acum o sa inlocuiesc fundurile la toti stupi cu funduri cu plasa si cand termin asta le voi pudra cu zahar.

[stefan1]

Da, aia sunt paduchii. Sper ca nu sunt pe fiecare larva, ca asta ar fi o infestare foarte mare. Fa macar la un stup tratament de control cu o substanta recunoscuta ca eficienta si observa rezultatul.

[D006]

Testul a fost facut pe un stup de acasa si in weekendul acesta va primi un fund cu plasa. La acelasi stup am facut poze multe la albina si le-am analizat marite si nu am vazut nicio varroa.
Este o colonie prospera pe 2 corpuri si ceva cam agresiva de la un timp.

[D006]

Eu sint plecat de mai mult timp din TARA si am uitat limba romina si uite asa vam tradus dupa stiinta ...     Am inteles ca in lupta contra varoa nu avem nevoie decit de un PIEPTENE

   
Da, dar nu ai vrut sa spui ca la fagure i se zice "honeycomb" si de acolo ai tradus tu doar "comb" adica PIEPTENE.
Oricum un studiu ff interesant.
Varroa se dezvolta bine in celulele mari.
In ultimi 20 de ani sa trecut la baza de ceara cu celule mari pt a scoate albine mai mari. Asta a usurat inmultirea la varroa.
Michael Bush, a testat ideea ca daca albine isi face singura fagurele la ce marime isi doreste varroa nu prospera. Cand pune faguri la cladit pune doar 3 cm sus pe rama pt inceput si rama o pune intre 2 rame deja cladite pt a primi o directie cat mai perfecta.
Si, da, varroa prefera fagure vechi si schimbarea lui la 3 ani reduce sansa de infestare.

[D006]

Ieri am pus funduri cu plasa la doua stupuri. Amandoua sunt pe doua corpuri de 1/1 si erau batute in cuie fundurile vechi dar cu ceva efort le-am scos cu albina in ele.
Acum amandoua au funduri cu plasa si azi dimineata am observat boabe de polen cazute sub stup si am pus o cutie de carton.
In stup este o margine solida de 3cm unde albina sa mearga fara sa calce pe plasa. O sa invete curand sa evite plasa? Sper.

[D006]

buna ziua,interesant articolul despre varroua